Re: [Boost-users] [lambda] helping lambda to deduce return type and then avoid 'ret<T>'

On 5/29/10 8:50 AM, alfC wrote:

On May 24, 5:05 pm, OvermindDL1 wrote:

...

On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Matthias Schabel

...

You should take a look at - Torsten Maehne contributed it to deal with interplay betweenlambdaandunits... Something similar might be worthwhile with interval as well.

or Boost.Phoenix, it handles such things better.

OvermindDL1, you are right, while lambda with units needs to explicitly to #include boost phoenix works out of the box

cout<< (boost::lambda::_1+boost::lambda::_1)(energy)<

Glad to hear. Anyway, it'll get even better. Right now, we're in the development stage of Phoenix-3 using proto. As you know, Phoenix-3 will be the next lambda. Boost-lambda will still be available, but will be in maintenance mode (and for backward compatibility) as soon as we get Phoenix-3 in the distribution. Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boostpro.com http://spirit.sf.net