data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4e66/b4e6618abd88571690777d58d3e735c7f53bb18c" alt=""
16 May
2006
16 May
'06
12:58 p.m.
Joel de Guzman
It will catch up :-) On a side note, it seems the tests were run with gcc 3.4. IIRC, gcc 4 and beyond introduced a couple of interesting optimizations so I wonder how far do those go towards narrowing the gap.
I would love to see better numbers for g++.
Building a later G++ under cygwin is pretty easy if you know what to do. That's how I stay abreast of G++ developments. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com