Roland Bock wrote:
Hi Joel,
sorry, I am not on the boost.devel list and I did not read the discussion there. I admit that I am new to public review and obviously did look not in all available places. I promise to catch up :-)
No problem :-)
My vote does not depend on the name of the library. I consider the things I learned about Phoenix so far pretty amazing! And I am in favor of the library being accepted in boost.
I just wanted to state that from my limited experience (about 15 years of development and about 10 years of coordinating a small team), I say that selfexplanatory names for variables, methods, classes and libraries are very helpful in the long run. I certainly don't want to force anybody. I had hoped to be able to convince you. But again, my vote does not depend on it :-)
Well, see my other (related) post. I think you will be happy :-)
Thanks for your answers!
Most welcome! Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boostpro.com http://spirit.sf.net