--- At Fri, 29 Aug 2003 11:02:51 +0200, Anders Moe wrote:
Hi again and thanks for your reply.
If I understand you correctly you suggest using the ctor/dtor in
class-test-case to do the job of build_up/tear_down. I suppose
--- In Boost-Users@yahoogroups.com, "Duane Murphy"
equivalent to setup/teardown. This works, ofcourse, because a C++ programmer can rely on the dtor being executed, unlike the Java finalizer.
Having worked some with CppUnit, I have wondered similarly.
It's hard to judge when a particular "feature" is put in to work around
Did you try to use Boost.Test? Any comparison? limitations or
differences in the language. When I studied JUnit, I didnt fully grasp the need for setUp and tearDown. This explaination makes some sense.
Do you mean, that in C++ we do not need explicit teardown and buildup?
The equivalent is simply member variables or something similar in C++.
I did not get this. An equivalent to what?
...Duane
Gennadiy.