Re: [Boost-users] [type traits] Extension to operator operatordetection -> choose your preferred naming

on Tue Aug 23 2011, Fr?d?ric Bron wrote:

We have come to three proposed lists of names (A, B and C): https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/wiki/GuideLines/Naming/OperatorTraitN ames I have included the corresponding names of standard keywords, standard function objects from <functional>, boost Proto and boost Operators.

Another vote for C (though having done nothing on this not sure my vote really counts for anything) - only issue I have with C is :- has_negate surely has_unary_minus needs to be there as an alias for this at the very least. Alex