30 Sep
2011
30 Sep
'11
5:48 p.m.
On Sep 30, 2011, at 1:44 PM, Kim Barrett wrote:
On Sep 30, 2011, at 12:29 PM, Andrew Sutton wrote:
Well, two anyways: == and !=. Given that the standard doesn't allow those on singular-valued iterators, you're right. I think the standard is a little too strict, here.
The underlying values that would need to be compared are potentially "trap" values (c.f. C++99/6.2.6/5).
A bit of an oops here; I had both C++ and C standards open on my screen; and referenced sections are from C. But the argument is still the same.