On Fri, 29 May 2009 18:10:23 +0200, David Abrahams
[...]Looks like a really useful library, and the docs are very readable. Sorry, I know this will seem trivial, and I see that you took care to note it on your webpage, but when posting about a library that is not yet in Boost, I'd appreciate it if you could make that clear. Just starting with "I've written an article about the proposed Boost.Process" could be enough, though it's also be good to get an indicator in the subject line.
ok, no problem. There have been so many Boost.Process forks last year though that it took me quite some time to merge them. Unless someone else really plans to take over responsibility for Boost.Process and doesn't change only minor things (thus creating another fork) I hope that this proposed Boost.Process library remains the only one. There is no problem if a differently designed Boost.Process library is proposed. But in the past years all the Boost.Process libraries were forks and you didn't really know which one to pick (which lead me to merge them all). Boris