Re: [Boost-users] boost::sub_range vs boost::iterator_range

11 Dec 2005

      Victor A. Wagner Jr. wrote:
...
At 16:18 2005-12-08, you wrote:
...
Victor A. Wagner Jr. wrote:
...
...
I've added the following overload
sub_range& operator=( sub_range r )
       {
           //
           // argument passed by value to avoid
           // const_iterator to iterator conversion
           //
           base::operator=( r );
           return *this;
       }
and can now compile your program.
I've also committed this to the main cvs.
yes, it compiles, and runs on vc7.1
it does NOT compile on vs8.0 (which is currently my default compiler)
was there any difference in the compiler there? Is it still operator= in
iterator_range that gets called?
yes, vs2005 has the vc8.0 compiler... I'll repost the program AND the errors...
http://www.noidea128.org/sourcefiles/15688~
that souce is already trying to call SNway_merge and shows 2 errors.
...
-Thorsten
_______________________________________________
Boost-users mailing list
Boost-users@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
Victor A. Wagner Jr.      http://rudbek.com
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
               "There oughta be a law"
Add:

   sub_range(const sub_range& r) :
     base(static_cast(r))
   { }

   sub_range& operator=(const sub_range& r)
   {
     base::operator=(static_cast(r));
     return *this;
   }

If 'static_cast's are missing, VC8 calls "constructor template" of 'iterator_range'.
Though I don't know the reason, this codes are safe.

Regards,
MB
http://p-stade.sourceforge.net/