6 Feb
2009
6 Feb
'09
4:10 a.m.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 10:47 PM, David Abrahams
on Thu Feb 05 2009, Michael Fawcett
wrote: Do you feel that such functionality doesn't belong in Boost.Iterator?
I definitely think it doesn't. Boost.Iterator is about constructing iterators. You're constructing a function. Boost.Lambda or Bind or Pheonix are the right tools for that job.
Right, it doesn't belong in Boost.Iterator.
I think it nicely complements function_output_iterator.
Then maybe function_output_iterator ought to be moved into the lambda lib ;-)
I only meant it seemed nice to have the converse available in the same form, not as a lamba construct. I'll stick with my little solution for now. --Michael Fawcett