Hi Joerg jhr.walter@t-online.de wrote:
Hi Benedikt,
I've already changed the start of it in my local copy to
---------- // Compiler specific problems: default configuration #if defined (BOOST_STRICT_CONFIG) || ! (\ defined (BOOST_MSVC) || \ defined (__GNUC__) || \ defined (__BORLANDC__) || \ defined (_ICL) || \ defined (_ICC) || \ defined (__COMO__) || \ defined (__MWERKS__)) ... #endif ----------
and added
---------- // Metrowerks Codewarrior #if defined (__MWERKS__) && ! defined (BOOST_STRICT_CONFIG)
#define BOOST_UBLAS_TYPENAME typename #define BOOST_UBLAS_USING using #define BOOST_UBLAS_EXPLICIT explicit
#define BOOST_UBLAS_USE_LONG_DOUBLE
#define BOOST_UBLAS_USE_STREAM
#define BOOST_UBLAS_NO_MEMBER_FRIENDS
#endif ----------
Works fine, thanks!
I've never put too much effort into the adoption of the build system, because ublas is header only from a user perspective.
You are right! The reason I was drifted towards bjam was because I was actually trying to understand bjam, so I could use it for an other project. Testing ublas was only a byproduct ;-). This does not mean that I am not interested in ublas. I still hope to use it one day in a project. In the meantime I am following the posts on the ublas-dev group at Yahoo. Benedikt