data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b77ab/b77abec4a7bbe370ae337577ae78f9d4ffd628db" alt=""
@Peter:
You were right, one of the threads was explicitly deleting the list and
hence the cause for the crash. Thanks for your help.
-Samm
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 3:38 AM, Peter Dimov
sumanth krishna wrote:
C is a singleton class and from the logs i can see that the other threads have exited before the destructor of C is called.
Well, in this case you should try to isolate a complete program that crashes and post it here.
Even if the thread calls c->getList after ~C is executed, then also it
should not cause a problem because until all the instances are deleted and reference count of the shared pointers reaches zero the memory for the allocated class should not be deleted.
No, destroying a shared_ptr in one thread and copying it from another doesn't work. Even if it did, destroying a std::list in one thread and iterating over it from another doesn't work either. If you access an object from more than one thread, all accesses must be read (non-modifying) accesses. ______________________________**_________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/**mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-**usershttp://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users