15 Sep
2006
15 Sep
'06
8:36 p.m.
-----Original Message----- From: boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Aubrey, Jason
Note1: I've no idea if a formal name for this pattern exists, if not it does now :) Note2: I recognize the security issues with this; however, if it's truly an issue I suppose the pImpl (i.e. pointer to implementation) idiom can be used in tandom so things are truly private from the client.
I just wonder: whats the big deal with breaking all the encapsulation rules to do unit tests?