4 Jan
2008
4 Jan
'08
2:22 a.m.
On Thursday 03 January 2008 12:43, j.c. wrote:
So the consensus here is to not use BOOST signals? I could implement
Noone said that.
the calls another way that would not break when the application becomes multithreaded, which is likely to happen at some point. I would have to implement some sort of queue and lookup an id and then via a pointer trigger the target function along with parameter. Also I noticed that BOOST signals added a cool 300KB to my static lib, strippable to 200KB, which I am not too happy about since this lib's intentions was small size.
I would guess adding Qt would bloat your application even more, as Qt tends to be more "in for a penny, in for a pound" than boost libs. -- Frank