Re: [Boost-users] [integer] Request: long long (64 bits) supportfor int_t and uint_t

Oops, a significant typo! I just wrote:

Why not having int_exact_t entirely based on the exact-width integer types from ? [ <---- typo!!! ]

But I meant to ask: Why not having int_exact_t entirely based on the exact-width integer types from ? I was thinking of boost::int32_t, boost::uint32_t, boost::int64_t, boost::uint64_t, etc... http://www.boost.org/boost/cstdint.hpp Kind regards, Niels