Dear Ion,
2011/8/17 Ion Gaztañaga
El 17/08/2011 5:12, Edward Diener escribió:
For all of the containers which have the same names as the std:: containers, it should be pointed out what their benefits are. if it is a matter of all those containers having move semantics, placement insertion, recursive containers, and stateful allocators, that should be mentioned. One would like to know why one should use the Containers library containers rather than the std:: containers without having to read the description of each container.
Ok
Some performance tests might be nice here too (and the code for generating them should be incorporated in the distribution), comparing to std:: libraries shipped with the popular compilers. It'll help sell your library and it'll serve as a nice benchmark later as vendors update their standard library implementations. At least, I'd be interested in such information and if test code is avaiable, I could easily run the testcases myself. Best, Dee