Le 06/03/2016 06:16, paul Fultz a écrit :
>
>
>
>
>> On Saturday, March 5, 2016 10:50 PM, Steven Watanabe <watan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> AMDG
>> On 03/05/2016 07:21 PM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
>>>   I want to start a new sub-thread about some of the concerns of Steven
>>>   Watanabe about whether some of the contents of this library fits better
>>>   in Boost.Config. In particular the file boost/fit/returns.hpp.
>>>
>> When I mentioned Boost.Config, I was talking about
>> things like
>>
>> #ifndef BOOST_FIT_NO_EXPRESSION_SFINAE
>> #ifdef _MSC_VER
>> #define BOOST_FIT_NO_EXPRESSION_SFINAE 1
>> #else
>> #define BOOST_FIT_NO_EXPRESSION_SFINAE 0
>> #endif
>> #endif
> This is can be configurable, whereas Boost.Config it is not.
I'm not sure this is true.
http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_60_0/libs/config/doc/html/index.html#boost_config.configuring_boost_for_your_platform.user_settable_options