Ticket 9017 added: <https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/9017>.  If you want, you can visit that web page to register yourself to get updates.
 
I’ll try to get at it (and the other reports) in the near-future, after adding some bug reports of my own, and my current project.
 
Daryle W.
 
Sent from Windows Mail
 
From: Michael Olea
Sent: ‎Monday‎, ‎August‎ ‎19‎, ‎2013 ‎7‎:‎15‎ ‎PM
To: boost-users@lists.boost.org
 
Hi.

I have some template code that needs slightly different behavior when it is instantiated
with exact types like int or boost::rational rather than when it is instantiated with
floating point types. The compile-time test depends on std::numeric_limits<T>::is_exact.
I was surprised when this came back false for boost::rational until I found that
std::numeric_limits<boost::rational<long>>::is_specialized
is false. Shouldn't boost::rational specialize numeric_limits?

I'm using boost 1.54.0 with clang: Apple LLVM version 4.2 (clang-425.0.28) (based on LLVM 3.2svn)
compiling for C++1.