17 Jul
2008
17 Jul
'08
12:26 a.m.
John C. Femiani wrote:
or to specialize boost::test_tools::tt_detail::print_log_value.
This I didn't try. It seemed a bit more hack-ish and a bit more work. Well both legal solutions involve using something from a 'detail' namespace, which scares me.
Hm, yes. You're afraid they will change the structure of that namespace from under our feet without even putting it in a changelog. Given that possibility, might it not be better to put it in namespace std anyway... Perhaps they should offer us a real solution in the next version? -- Michiel Helvensteijn