[Boost-users] How & when to use weak_ptr

2 Jul 2011

      Hi -- I'm loving how easy shared_ptr makes object handling, but am not sure
about how to use weak_ptr.
Should I use it in places where previously I would have, say, returned a
const reference?
For example:
  struct MyClass {
    const  OtherObject & other_object() const;
  };

Would become:
  struct MyClass {
    weak_ptr<const OtherObject> other_object() const;
  };

Or is this wasteful, having weak_ptrs construct from shared_ptrs every time
I want to access an member object?
Or have I missed the point completely? ;)

One convention I thought I might adopt would be like this:
  struct MyClass {
    void set_other_object( shared_ptr<OtherObject> ); // setter
    weak_ptr<OtherObject> get_other_object();           // non-const getter
    const OtherObject & other_object() const;             // const getter
  };

Of course, that could be all kinds of dumb for all kinds of reasons I don't
know about. :)
Cheers,
   Doug.

[Boost-users] How & when to use weak_ptr

doug livesey