Re: [Boost-users] boost::interprocess boost::interprocess xsi_shared_memory

Is there a reason for not finishing the implementation of XSI (System V) shared memory? It seems like most of the work is already done. If there is no reason not to, I might be able to finish the implementation so that it can be included in the next release. I know that POSIX may be sufficient for some, but System V allows for much better control using SELinux since it lives in kernel space. FYI: This is in response to http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.user/64537. Thoughts? Thanks. - Daniel