Re: [Boost-users] boost 1.37, tr1 and gcc 4.x

ACSoft wrote:

...

I think the boost implementations should move the std::tr1 implementation into the boost namespace if possible. This should solve all the problems.

example:

array.hpp

#ifdef STL_ARRAY_EXISTS # ifdef USE_TR1 # include # else # include <array> # endif #endif

namespace boost { #ifdef STL_ARRAY_EXISTS # ifdef USE_TR1 using std::tr1::array; # else using std::array; # endif #else template<...> class array { //... }; #endif }

What do you think of this idea?

Personally I'm violently opposed for the reasons I gave in a previous mail. Sorry, John.