2 Sep
2009
2 Sep
'09
12:19 p.m.
er wrote:
Steven Watanabe wrote:
AMDG
What does the default constructor have to do with it?
Also, the enable_if you put on it is wrong.
Since enable_if is wrong (no ::type), then I guess it is the other change (accessing the base through super_t) which corrects the problem below, right?
... Is there some problem you're trying to solve?