Yeah.. exactly this is what I wanted to know..
thank you.
Hello R.P,
Inheriting from enable_shared_from_this more than once is not a good idea.
> From: boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-users-
> bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of R. P. Janaka
> Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 6:54 AM
> To: boost-users@lists.boost.org
> Subject: Re: [Boost-users] How shared_from_this() work when it
> inherited from more than one time
>Don't let B inherit from enable_shared_from_this. You've already done that in A. So your question then becomes "how do I retrieve a shared_ptr<B> from this?". Here's how:
> But in my case there is no option like this (Class A is a base library
> class). So I have to do this.
>
boost::shared_dynamic_cast<B, A>(shared_from_this());
In the example you've provided, it would also be safe to use boost::shared_static_cast.
To conclude: You should only inherit from enable_shared_from_this in A, and B should only inherit from A.
You did. But the problem is that you have two weak_ptrs -- one weak_ptr<A> and one weak_ptr<B> -- and only one of them will be initialized correctly when you create the smart pointer. (If you're interested in debugging your case to really understand what happens, have a look at the function
> I did the above to avoid the ambiguous call error So how can I specify
> that i am calling the shared_from_this() in class B....?
sp_enable_shared_from_this() in shared_ptr.hpp.)
Does that help?
Cheers,
Bjorn Karlsson
_______________________________________________
Boost-users mailing list
Boost-users@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users