10 Sep
2009
10 Sep
'09
2:41 p.m.
Sebastian Theophil wrote:
Internally, the boost::reverse_iterator you propose also has to decrement, so it doesn't work any better. Additionally, your proposed solution crashes because other->geneVect.rbegin().base() returns in fact other->geneVect.end(). Only *other->geneVect.rbegin() returns *(other->geneVect.end()-1).
Thanks, Steven and Sebastian. I've learned something today.