Hi, I've just found that we have a compiler error when using the BOOST_REQUIRE_THROW macro in a if/else statement with implicit block. Let's have an example: BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(foo) { if(true) BOOST_REQUIRE_THROW(throw std::exception(), std::exception); else BOOST_REQUIRE_THROW(throw std::exception(), std::exception); } Will fail with: file.cpp: In member function ‘void foo::test_method()’: file.cpp:184:2: error: ‘else’ without a previous ‘if’ To make it work, we need to put explicit block: BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(foo) { if(true) { BOOST_REQUIRE_THROW(throw std::exception(), std::exception); } else { BOOST_REQUIRE_THROW(throw std::exception(), std::exception); } } Wouldn't it be possible to add this block in the macro so library users don't have to care about? PS: Sorry for my writing, I'm not a native English speaker. -- Martin Desharnais martin.desharnais@gmail.com