Re: [Boost-users] circular_buffer, debug and invalid iterator checking

On 11/8/2010 2:58 PM, Nigel Stewart wrote:

Since the iterator is random access, perhaps they could be converted to integers via operator - and converted back to integers via operator + or operator +=.

That's what I did, but I used std::distance and std::advance instead, as per Meyer's suggestion in Effective STL. -- Anthony Foglia Princeton Consultants (609) 987-8787 x233