Your fix pass all my personnal tests. Thanks. Sorry for the trouble, according to the limit close to zero. Bye the way do you know when 1_55 version will be publicly available? Jean-Eric Le 18/10/2013 11:01, John Maddock a écrit :
1) in your patch for T operator()() part, what's the "n" variable, looking at 1_54_0 version there is no mention to this variable.
There are no changes to operator()(), the n variable appears in the next part of the diff in
inline T sph_bessel_j_imp(unsigned n, T x, const Policy& pol)
2) is there a way to get your current version of the bessel.hpp file ?
Attached.
Note I had to change the previous fix somewhat as it failed for types with extended exponent ranges (I realised that just as I was dozing off to sleep last night!)
That's true that for x close to zero but positive there are also problems to the use of power series close to 0 is certainly the best thing to do. I am astonished that this not yet used.
Sorry I don't understand: the problem was occurring inside the power series for small x.
John.
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users