7 Feb
2015
7 Feb
'15
4:20 p.m.
On 7 Feb 2015 at 3:12, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
But comparing thread-safe implementations with implementations that are not thread-safe seems a bit unfair to me.
Is it reallistic that folks would want a variant of signals that's not threadsafe, trading some callback restrictions for performance?
I think a version which is compile time switchable is the ideal. However, a non-thread safe implementation isn't particularly interesting. It's easy to achieve high performance if you have a giant mutex wrapping everything. Niall -- ned Productions Limited Consulting http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/