Re: [Boost-users] [Lambda] Handling Bind/Lambda name clashes.

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Dave Abrahams wrote:

At Wed, 06 Apr 2011 02:41:45 +0700, Eric Niebler wrote:

...

And perhaps boost::bind and its placeholders should also be in an ADL-blocker namespace, but I seem to recall that the placeholders are not in any namespace for legacy reasons, is that right?

At this point, if such legacy compilers need to be supported, perhaps it makes sense to put the placeholders in a namespace conditionally, for all the other compilers?

I wonder if it would be a good idea to have a Boost-wide policy that says something like,

Librarry interfaces should not be compromised in any way for compilers shipped more than 10 years ago/not supported by their manufacturer/<appropriate other criterion here>

From my point of view the problem of the _1, _2, _3, etc placeholders in the

Whatever policy might apply henceforth I'd imagine that moving the Boost.Bind placeholders out of the global namespace would be completely out of the question at this point. presence of #include is manageable by simply avoiding using them, and simply using arg1, arg2, arg3 or x, y, z and defining them as appropriate Boost.Lambda placeholders. The issue of Boost.Function dragging Boost.Bind into name lookup is harder to deal with. Peter's shorthand for explicit qualification on every use is about best option I think. How does Eric's ADL-blocker namespace mechanism work? - Rob.