Re: [Boost-users] Mersenne twister problem

Hi Matthias Troyer-2 wrote:

I would write this very differently, and can give you a better version that should have no problems, but could you please send me the definition of GeneratorI first?

Sorry about that, the missing typedefs at SearchFunctor: typedef boost::mt19937 base_generator_type; typedef boost::variate_generator<base_generator_type&, boost::uniform_real<> > GeneratorI; -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Mersenne-twister-problem-tp25382114p25432292.html Sent from the Boost - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.