Re: [Boost-users] [program_options] patch - optional argument support (gnu getopt_long style)

Steven Mackenzie wrote:

Very useful to me, thanks!

I'm guessing that the implicit_value is distinct from the default_value, so that the default can be set seperately if the option is completely absent from the command line?

Heh, that's what I referred to in some previous discussion -- we kinda have *two* different default values, which can be confusing. - Volodya