Re: [Boost-users] Boost.Test Documentation

-----Original Message----- From: boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org]On Behalf Of Gennadiy Rozental Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 5:39 AM To: boost-users@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Boost.Test Documentation

"Yann Golanski" wrote in message news:20070814084453.GB60576@kierun.org...

...

For example:

http://www.patmedia.net/~rogeeff/html/utf/user-guide/runtime-config/referenc...

...

In "report_level", the levels are indicated as no, confirm, short and detaled -- the latter should be details.

Actually it's "detailed". Fixed anyway

On this page (report_level) the "Command line argument name" seems to be wrong. Also on the "detect_memory_leak" page. Why the list of parameters on the "Runtime parameters reference page" consists of the command line argument names? Shouldn't it be the full names instead? Uwe. *** The information in this e-mail is confidential and intended solely for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender by return e-mail delete this e-mail and refrain from any disclosure or action based on the information. ***