[Boost-users] Re: Any interest in postconstruction/predestructionfacility?

"Malte Starostik" wrote:

I'm using a wrapper class to automate postconstruction and predestruction. A preliminarily boostified version (added licence header, changed namespace to boost) is available at http://malte.homeip.net/~malte/prepost/

How is your solution better than to have - factory function/class for post-constructor and - deleter attached to shared_ptr for pre-destructor? /Pavel