Marshall Clow wrote:
On Jan 25, 2010, at 1:49 PM, joel falcou wrote:
Bo Jensen wrote:
Hey I was not saying they were right, merely pointing out other approaches. Some kind of boost cpplint might be a simple solution Was just a bit amazed to find such stuff there, not criticizing your contribution.
The boostlint idea is sound :)
I agree. And I think that the best way to do that is .... via clang. http://clang.llvm.org
-- Marshall
I recently (2 weeks ago) started working for Grammatech (makers of CodeSonar, see http://grammatech.com), and one of the things they were looking for when we interviewed was the ability to help their static analysis get to where it could provide high quality feedback on modern C++. The tool makers are developing a strong interest in providing better analysis tools for C++, and hopefully that effort will succeed. John