Programmer_blabla <Programmer_blabla@hotmail.com> wrote:
Ok thank you, I will post this on microsoft.public.vc.language.
About the other thing, I originally thinked about that. But what to specifiy, using the typedef's won't work either (see below):
int i; boost::tuple<int> data(27);
i = boost::tuples::get<0, boost::tuple<int>::head_type, boost::tuple<int>::tail_type>(data); //ok i = boost::bind(&boost::tuples::get<0, boost::tuple<int>::head_type, boost::tuple<int>::tail_type>, _1)(data); //error <snip>
Yes, I see, there's ambiguity as to whether this means template<int N, class HT, class TT> typename access_traits<typename element<N, cons<HT, TT> >::type> ::non_const_type get(cons<HT, TT> & c); or template<int N, class HT, class TT> typename access_traits<typename element<N, cons<HT, TT> >::type> ::const_type get(const cons<HT, TT> & c); You can resolve the ambiguity by writing: typedef const int & const_int_getter( const boost::tuple<int>::inherited &); i = boost::bind(static_cast<const_int_getter *>(&boost::get<0>), _1) (data);