Ali F wrote:
Does that file exist on disk?
Thanks a lot John. That did it. So it was because I was building the libraries wrong... This boost.build is a little confusing. I'm still not entirely sure what I was doing wrong actually. Was it just bjam release debug stage as opposed to what you suggested? I thought bjam builds static libs automatically. And if it was prefixed with 'lib' then it was static right? So why did the above fix it? I'm sorry I'm so dense, hopefully this one last reply with lodge this in my head permanently.
Boost.Build changed it's default behaviour from 1.34 to 1.35 to only build a single release variant by default: this suites Unix flavours, but is pretty useless for MSVC :-( And yes you were building static libraries before, just not the right ones to match the code-generation options you were using. John.