8 Mar
2005
8 Mar
'05
4:50 p.m.
"David Abrahams" <dave@boost-consulting.com> wrote in message news:usm36p768.fsf@boost-consulting.com... | "Thorsten Ottosen" <nesotto@cs.auc.dk> writes: | > but we will have boost::end() and boost::mpl::end<>. Shouldn't that be enough? | > | > The problem before was unqualified calls to end() as I understood it. That | > will not | > be needed for ADL to kick in anymore. | | Weren't you going to have boost::end() find the user's end via ADL? no, I was going to find user's adl_end() function via ADL. So this changes the extension protocol to overloading adl_end() from overloading end(). -Thorsten