Sry but I do not understand. I do specify the implementation with
template<class Archive>
void PaloClient::serialize( Archive &ar, const unsigned int version
) {
ar & m_PaloClientImpl;
}
as you suggest and as I have written in example 1.
Then I write
template void PaloClient::serializeboost::archive::text_iarchive(
boost::archive::text_iarchive & ar,
const unsigned int file_version
);
template void PaloClient::serializeboost::archive::text_oarchive(
boost::archive::text_oarchive & ar,
const unsigned int file_version
);
to make the compiler generate code for these two template parameters.
It works for me in other cases and it is what the documentation says.
I dont think that removing the two template-specification could solve the
issue,
since the template function-definition is not included in any header file.
There must be some misunderstanding.
Kind regards, Oliver
On Nov 29, 2007 5:27 PM, Robert Ramey
This is a C++ syntax issue.
The first example explicitly instantiates the serialize declaration without specifying its implementation which leads to an undefined symbol. just use:
template<class Archive> void PaloClient::serialize( Archive &ar, const unsigned int version ) { ar & m_PaloClientImpl; }
and the appropriate code wil be instantiated if and only if it is actually invoked.
Robert Ramey
"Oliver Kania"
wrote in message news:1262c4ee0711290739x12408875u39e54bbe9effb093@mail.gmail.com... Hello ! When linking a program that consists only of main.cpp with a library that serializes a class "Palo Cllient" I get the following message (sry for the mess):
================================================== error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol "private: void __thiscall jedox::palo::PaloClient::serialize<class boost::archive::text_oarchive>(class boost::archive::text_oarchive &,unsigned int)" (??$serialize@ Vtext_oarchive@archive@boost@@@ PaloClient@palo@jedox@@AAEXAAVtext_oarchive@archive@boost@@I@Z) referenced in function "public: static void __cdecl boost::serialization::access::serialize
(class boost::archive::text_oarchive &,class jedox::palo::PaloClient &,unsigned int)" (??$serialize@ Vtext_oarchive@archive@boost@@VPaloClient@palo @jedox@@@access@serialization@boost@@SAXAAVtext_oarchive@archive@ 2@AAVPaloClient@palo@jedox@@I@Z) ================================================== This happens even though I do NOT explicitly serialize anything. Main.cpp includes:
#include
#include For the class PaloClient, I do use the Pimpl idiom and serialize as it is recommended in the documentation:
PaloClient.cpp:
--------------------------------------------------------------
#include
#include #include ....
template<class Archive> void PaloClient::serialize( Archive &ar, const unsigned int version ) { ar & m_PaloClientImpl; }
template void PaloClient::serializeboost::archive::text_iarchive( boost::archive::text_iarchive & ar, const unsigned int file_version );
template void PaloClient::serializeboost::archive::text_oarchive( boost::archive::text_oarchive & ar, const unsigned int file_version ); ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now, when I change this to
void PaloClient::serialize(boost::archive::text_iarchive & ar, const unsigned int file_version) { ar & m_PaloClientImpl; }
void PaloClient::serialize (boost::archive::text_oarchive & ar, const unsigned int file_version) { ar & m_PaloClientImpl; }
The linkage error disappears. I guess this is a Visual C++ compiler problem but I wanted to post this in case someone else has similar problems.
Kind regards, Oliver
PS: Thanks for this great serialization library, it saved me many weeks of programming.
------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users