Re: [Boost-users] [Spirit] Semantic actions (binary parser) - user error or bug?

Seems perfectly normal to me.  You need omit[] around stuff that you don't want to appear as part of the attribute for a rule.  Since your rule's attribute is only a byte, including big_dword as part of the rule without omit would mean that its part of the attribute for the rule too and that doesn't match the layout of the test struct.

Hi, What's wrong with the following code, and how can I fix it? The semantic actions seem to be inconsistent (or maybe I'm using them wrong). No omit, but no value? Thanks.