Re: [Boost-users] [result_of] Simple question

Hello,

Doesn't Boost.Function support 'result_of', or am I missing something obvious?

More the opposite, result_of doesn't support boost::function and is quite limited without "recent" compiler features.

typedef boost::result_of::type my_return_type;

You may want to use "#define BOOST_RESULT_OF_USE_DECLTYPE" if your compiler is recent enough. Explanations in the docs of result_of. Of course if your compiler is even more recent, it may support * std::result_of.* Regards, Julien PS: niXman solution will work even better if you don't have too many functions...