Re: [Boost-users] [mpl] newbie question

"Andy Little" wrote

The expectation ( based on OP's light reading of examples I guess ) is this

assert( boost::is_same < mpl::transform< vector_c ,vector_c ,some_plus_func > ::type , vector_c

...

::value == true);

Personally I think ( even ) that is with (some mods) a realistic expectation.

FWIW Enclosed is a small sample which seems to work ok in VC7.1 and gcc4.01, bearing in mind its based on expectations not status quo Formatting of output works best in vc7.1 BTW. IOW Its not impossible to make it work. Might be useful as a relatively simple demo anyway. Could also be used to explain the reasons for rejecting this approach too of course ;-) regards Andy Little begin 666 test.cpp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` ` end