Re: [Boost-users] [Lambda] Handling Bind/Lambda name clashes.

Please ignore my incoherent babbling. Need sleep... On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Dave Abrahams wrote:

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Peter Dimov wrote:

...

Robert Jones wrote:

...

...

On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Peter Dimov wrote:

  using boost::lambda::bind;

should be a better choice.

Hello Peter

Yes, that was my first thought too. But this code still has ambiguity issues.

Yes, you're right, it has. Since boost::function is in namespace boost, the compiler still finds boost::bind via argument-dependent lookup. I'm afraid that you'll have to qualify the ambiguous bind:

namespace ll = boost::lambda; ll::bind( my_sum, ... );

I may have forgotten the real truth, but at one point I thought I knew that the compiler would do ADL on using-declarations, but not on names brought in via using-directive.

-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com

-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com