Mart marvin wrote:
Now that's silly. When did ".h" stop being good enough!? Well it did compile so I can't complain too hard...but why change it to hpp? I can understand modern C++ has benefits over the older like that when memory allocation fails it throws a bad_alloc, but changing things like "h" to "hpp" is just changing for the sake of change.
Without looking at the content... How would you tell the difference between a C language header and C++ language header? I'm not trying to start some language or naming war... Just pointing out the obvious reasoning. And everyone is free to ignore this message ;-) -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - Grafik/jabber.org