Re: [Boost-users] BJAM and VS2013RC

On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 05:26:22PM +0100, Craig Henderson wrote:

VS2013RC does have deleted and default functions.

Sent from my iPhone

On 19 Sep 2013, at 17:20, "Niall Douglas" wrote:

...

On 18 Sep 2013 at 19:05, Lars Viklund wrote:

...

Among them, I think pretty much only the Boost.Build patch has been applied to trunk, the rest are suffering either from quabbling about whether to support non-release compilers or plain neglect.

I've been running VS2013 RC last few days with the following additional features above and beyond VS2013 Preview turned on:

//#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_DECLTYPE_N3276 //#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_DEFAULTED_FUNCTIONS //#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_DELETED_FUNCTIONS //#define BOOST_NO_CXX11_TEMPLATE_ALIASES

I believe that Niall, like me in my post, meant that these negative feature macros shall be non-defined when targetting 2013RC. The omission of a negative feature macro implies that the feature is supported. -- Lars Viklund | zao@acc.umu.se