On 02-11-2012 07:11, Robert Ramey wrote:
I want to use Boost.Range in a bigger way. But I have a few problems with it. I think most of them are just issues of understanding and the writting of the documentation
Ok.
To me, the range documentation is out of whack. I can figure it out - but it's misleading - atleast to me.
I think some of the original up-front examples disappeared in version 2. You can still browse them under "Examples".
c) Another really annoying thing is that every thing is directly in the boost namespace. This breaks the convention that library headers are in boost/<library name> and in the namespace boost::<library name>. This creates a lot of opportunity for conflict.
Maybe so, but how would you change that without breaking code? -Thorsten