Re: [Boost-users] Report from Mont Tremblant C++ Committee meeting

On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 01:58:10PM -0400, Gennadiy Rozental wrote:

"John Maddock" wrote in message news:01ab01c5cf13$49900270$fc220d52@fuji...

...

...

...

There are already several others (FlexiString, sgi's rope) and several are already

Non of them is standard, so no need to pay attention. Any *string* class that want conform string_algo interface needs to satisfy const_string one.

And back in the real world users use all kinds of propietory string types: CString, UnicodeString,AnsiString, WideString, need I go on? Users *have* to use these types to interact with their native GUI's and other class libraries, having a string type neutral algorithm library allows them to interact with all of these without copying data all the time. Oh and what about memory mapped files, should we be able to support those as well?

IMO all these non-standard string classes are beside the point. It's maybe ok for Boost library to try to accommodate everything. But String Algorithms as part of STL should define some specific concepts that are expected users string to support and should be primarily oriented to work nicely with standard string.

Will you please provide us with some information where the current implementation does *not* work nicely with the standard string? Regards, Pavol