20 May
2003
20 May
'03
4:29 p.m.
"William E. Kempf" wrote: [...]
The motivations are backwards here, though. If the C++ language adopts a threading library, POSIX systems will have a lot of motivation for defining a POSIX C++ binding, or at the very least, making a particular implementation's POSIX binding compatible with the C++ threading.
How about moving this discussion to c.p.t.? regards, alexander. -- "// Possible implementation for <iohw.h> #include <hardware> using namespace std::hardware;" -- 02-0054/N1396