Sure, I will upgrade. ;) You told me once that xpressive 2.0 is out... Anyway, I thought there might be people unable to upgrade from 1.34.1 to another version (in big companies this can take some long time...), but who still can put in their build process additional libs (
e.g. fusion 2.0) and this patch might be useful for them.<br><br>Best Regards,<br>Ovanes<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 10/16/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Eric Niebler</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:eric@boost-consulting.com">
eric@boost-consulting.com</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>Ovanes Markarian wrote:<br>&gt; Eric,<br>
&gt;<br>&gt; attached is the subversion diff file. I used the official boost 1.34.1<br>&gt; with contained xpressive and patched it for fusion 2.0.<br>&gt;<br>&gt; using this define will switch to fusion v2 support&gt;<br>
&gt;<br>&gt; #ifndef BOOST_XPRESSIVE_FUSION_V2<br>&gt; #&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;define BOOST_XPRESSIVE_FUSION_V2<br>&gt; #endif<br>&gt;<br>&gt; As we have internal version control under which the xpressive 1.34.1<br>&gt; sources were the patch contains revision 9&nbsp;&nbsp;to working copy.
<br><br><br>Ovanes, while you were working on this patch, I was busy releasing the<br>next version of xpressive. Version 2.0 is in the file vault now and will<br>(hopefully!) be in Boost 1.35. So I&#39;m a sorry to say your patch is now
<br>out of date. My suggestion is that you continue using the patch, and<br>upgrade to 1.35 when it comes out.<br><br>--<br>Eric Niebler<br>Boost Consulting<br><a href="http://www.boost-consulting.com">www.boost-consulting.com
</a><br>_______________________________________________<br>Boost-users mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Boost-users@lists.boost.org">Boost-users@lists.boost.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users">
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users</a><br></blockquote></div><br>