Re: [Boost-users] WG: defining a function<>-object with a returnvalue of the same type (recursive declaration)

On 5/3/06, Oliver.Kowalke@qimonda.com wrote:

Hmm - I would use boost::function instead of declaring a function-pointer object by myself.

Go for it. I just pasted the code from Herb Sutter's article that showed how to accomplish what you wanted with a function object and a function pointer. You could probably move that into a function<> if that's what you need. -Michael Fawcett