On 02/26/11 15:55, Larry Evans wrote:
On 02/26/11 15:25, Michael Caisse wrote:
On 02/26/2011 01:08 PM, Larry Evans wrote:
followed by several other error messages.
Any ideas what's wrong?
-Larry
Hi Larry -
FWIW, I think most of us test libraries under review by placing them within a boost source tree. Is there a reason that this approach is not acceptable?
Well, I just hadn't thought of that. IOW, I'd move:
/home/evansl/prog_dev/boost-svn/ro/trunk/sandbox/ro/SOC /2010/phoenix3/libs/phoenix
to:
/home/evansl/prog_dev/boost-svn/ro/trunk/libs/phoenix
and:
/home/evansl/prog_dev/boost-svn/ro/trunk/sandbox/ro/SOC /2010/phoenix3/boost/phoenix
to:
/home/evansl/prog_dev/boost-svn/ro/trunk/boost/phoenix
and then run the tests?
However, I'm not sure that would avoid the error messages I last reported: gcc.compile.c++ bin/container_tests1a.test/gcc-4.4.3/debug/container/container_tests1a.o In file included from /home/evansl/prog_dev/boost-svn/ro/trunk/boost/proto/matches.hpp:33, from ../../../boost/phoenix/core/meta_grammar.hpp:15, from ../../../boost/phoenix/core/is_nullary.hpp:15, from ../../../boost/phoenix/core/actor.hpp:18, from ../../../boost/phoenix/core.hpp:12, from container/container_tests.hpp:11, from container/container_tests1a.cpp:7: /home/evansl/prog_dev/boost-svn/ro/trunk/boost/mpl/aux_/template_arity.hpp:86:1: error: macro "BOOST_PP_TUPLE_ELEM_2_0" requires 2 arguments, but only 1 given The above message does not report any missing .hpp file, it just reports a macro given the wrong number of arguments. How would changing the location of the phoenix files avoid that kind of error? -Larry